Passionate Giving Blog

Are You Using Your CRM the Right Way? - Veritus Group

Written by Jeff Schreifels | March 10, 2026

Here’s a hard but useful question to ask yourself: if you had to hand one of your donor portfolios to a new Major Gift Officer tomorrow, could they step in and keep those relationships moving without missing a beat?

If your answer is “eh… probably not,” don’t panic. You’re not alone. It just means your CRM is probably doing what it was built to do, not what you need it to do.

Most donor databases were designed around transactions. Appeals. Events. Gifts in, receipts out. Major gifts, though, are a relationship business. And when your system doesn’t support relationships, you end up doing extra work, and your donors end up feeling like they’re starting over every time something changes internally.

The good news is you don’t need a new database. You just need to put more intention into it.

Let me walk you through the pieces that matter most, and why they make your life easier and your donors feel better cared for.

Start with One Simple Question: Where Is This Donor Right Now?

The single biggest issue we see in CRMs is a lack of clarity—or, specifically, not having a clean answer to the question: where does this donor actually stand today?

That’s where a mutually exclusive status field comes in. For example:

  • Pool: not yet qualified
  • Qualified: two-way engagement, moving toward an ask
  • Qualified Don’t Count: qualified, but tied to multiple accounts
  • Stewardship Only: engaged, but not expecting current gifts
  • Disqualified (with specific reasons)

This is different from moves management stages like cultivation or solicitation, which change all the time. Status tells you the donor’s state of being. Without it, your portfolio is fuzzy. And fuzzy portfolios create stress, missed opportunities, and a lot of wasted energy.

Disqualification Is Not Failure

Let’s talk about disqualification for a minute, because it gets a bad rap.

If someone isn’t responsive, only wanted to make one gift, is ill, or has clearly asked not to be contacted this way, that’s not a loss. That’s clarity.

Good disqualification codes might include non-responsive, one-time gift, ill or elderly, deceased, or donor request. Pair those with a “move to” field, like annual giving, planned giving, or mass marketing.

Why does this matter? Because when it’s time to refresh or rebuild a caseload, you don’t accidentally pull the same uninterested donors back into someone else’s portfolio. You respect the donor’s wishes, and you protect the MGO’s time.

That’s a win for everyone.

Tiering Isn’t Busywork. It’s Self-Preservation.

If all your donors get treated the same, the most important ones suffer.

Tiering helps you decide where to spend your limited time. We usually recommend an A/B/C/D approach:

  • A donors: the top 10–15% with the greatest potential
  • B donors: the next 20–25%
  • C donors: the largest group
  • D donors: special situations that need different handling

When tiers live in your CRM and are easy to see, you can actually act on them. You can say, “Today I’m focusing on my A donors,” and do exactly that. No custom report. No guessing.

One client even created a weekly habit called “No Tier Tuesday.” Any donor without a tier gets dealt with. Simple and effective!

Every Donor Record Needs a Story

Here’s another test: does each donor record tell a coherent story?

Every donor should have a narrative profile that explains who they are, what they care about, what the strategy is, and where the relationship is headed.

Write it for the person who’s going to read it three years from now. Use real dates. Edit it as things change. Remove what’s no longer relevant.

When a new MGO can read one note and understand the relationship, the donor never feels like they’re starting over. That’s how you make someone feel known.

Interests Only Matter If You Use Them

If your CRM has interest fields, use them. And make sure they actually match your programs.

When a new project launches or something urgent comes up, you should be able to pull every donor who cares about that area in seconds. Same goes for personalizing communications. Knowing what someone cares about turns a generic message into something that feels intentional.

If a donor tells you their interests in a survey or conversation and that information never makes it into their record, you’ve wasted a gift they gave you: attention.

Make Giving Vehicles Visible

DAFs, stock, IRA distributions. These are no longer edge cases. They’re central to major gift work.

If a donor gives to your organization through a DAF, that should be visible right on their main record. Same with stock gifts or IRA giving. When you can see this at a glance, you can time outreach better, segment smarter, and stop reinventing the wheel every fall.

Planned giving status belongs here, too. Confirmed, in process, unknown. When that information is visible, your collaboration gets easier and your conversations get more natural.

Your Dashboard Should Answer Three Questions

When you open your CRM in the morning, your dashboard should tell you three things immediately: who needs attention, who’s been neglected, and what asks are coming up.

Useful widgets include year-over-year revenue, donor status breakdowns, tier distribution, last contact timing, highest level of contact, and upcoming asks. This is all about being proactive, not reactive.

After all, a well-structured database is an act of care.

When a donor calls and you already know their story, their interests, their giving patterns, and your last conversation, they feel known. And donors who feel known stick around.

So here’s your practical challenge: pull up one donor record this week and ask yourself, honestly, “If I handed this to a new MGO tomorrow, would they be set up for success?”

If the answer is no, you know exactly where to start.