When we evaluate a non-profit’s major gift performance, we really zero in on two things: value retention (caseload value in terms of dollars retained year over year) and donor retention (number of donors on a caseload that continue their giving year after year).
What we usually find when digging into the performance of the major gift program is quite dreadful. Over a four-year period of tracking donor behavior, most non-profits’ value retention is only in the 30-60% range, and donor retention can be worse.
That’s a lot of money and donors going out the back door of the non-profit. Sometimes that means millions of dollars and hundreds of people.
Remember, these are major donors, not $10 donors!
What’s worse is that many non-profits don’t even know it’s happening, because new donors are coming in, and their giving is masking the attrition of the “old” donors.
So it becomes a revolving door. Current donors stop giving, and new donors take their place. Year after year after year after year.
No real growth happens. Revenue remains flat, and leadership starts wondering what the problem is.
I’ll tell you the problem: we get so enamored with “new donors or new money” that we fail to cultivate and steward the donors we have. If you’d just listen to Crosby, Stills and Nash and their song “Love the One You’re With,” your major gift program would start to flourish and really take root.
But we can’t seem to get it in our heads that this is exactly what we need to do. Here is what seems to divert our attention:
- The ED tells the MGO that “there are a lot of wealthy people in town, I want you to bring us some.” Disaster! The MGO goes out chasing money, rather than building relationships with his caseload of donors.
- The organization has dozens of events to bring in new donors that the MGO is expected to “help” with. So the caseload gets neglected because the MGO is running out to the party store to get napkins and paper plates.
- Even though the MGO has a full caseload of donors, the CEO tells the MGO he needs to do more prospecting and she expects that 25% of his time should be dedicated to finding new major donors — and because the MGO has NO discipline, that 25% turns into 75%. Revenue plummets, retention tanks, and everyone wonders why major gift revenue is so behind.
Are any of these scenarios familiar to you? They are to Richard and me. We hear one of these three almost every day. It’s a sad, broken story, but one that can easily be fixed if you create focus and discipline in your major gift program.
By staying focused on retaining value and donors year over year, you will find yourself creating goals for every donor, a strategy to obtain those goals, and a disciplined communication strategy that is designed to cultivate and steward donors. This will result in building solid relationships and ultimately significant gifts to your organization.
But your focus has to be your current caseload of donors. Not the “rich woman” on the other side of town who has a ton of capacity. Don’t allow yourself to stray off the path of minding your portfolio of donors.
Again, your focus needs to be on relationship-building, retention, upgrading, retention, casting a vision, retention, helping donors find joy, retention, challenging donors to higher levels of giving, retention, providing outstanding donor service and finally, retention.
If you focus your energy on that, you will be wildly successful and your donors will find joy and fulfillment in their giving. Don’t be deceived by the promise of the shiny new object (“there’s gold out there if we just mined it”). No, there is gold right here in your own donor base and in your current caseload. Don’t “mine” new donors; MIND your current donors.
Jeff
Jeff and Richard,
This reminds me of a corporate profitability and customer retention book which came out 20 years ago. There the premise was that by retaining 10% more (I think that was the number–it was relatively small and astonishing) of their existing customers, profitability could go up some astronomical amount like 50%. Again the issue was this masking of customer attrition you speak of. No one realized how much profits could go up just by focusing on existing customers.
Thus I was wondering if you had any stats related to our NGO development world such as “if you keep 20% more of your donors year in and year out, your fundraising results will increase by X%.”
Such statistics would motivate us all, I think, to keep our eye on the existing donors, just as you suggest.
Thanks again for the reminder about this key behavior.
Bill
The book I mentioned in my previous post a moment ago is THE LOYALTY EFFECT by Reichheld at Bain and Company from 1996.
Bill
I always get a new tidbit of information or positive reinforcement of what I already do from your daily blogs.
I wanted to share what one of my MG donors said of me this week (relates totally to relationship building and retention)
“I have always appreciated the personal touch you have given to the organization-donor relationship. Although we are not directly active with the organization, we have always felt like a valued member of the org’s family thanks to your thoughtful notes and updates on areas you knew would be of particular interest to us. We realize it takes time and organization to add that extra touch to the donor experience and want you to know that it was appreciated, and is in part why we continue to support the org.”
I also shared with my colleagues who sometimes don’t believe this to be a priority activity.