When Richard started Veritus Group, and I later joined him, we started out working with clients on creating, building and managing only major gift programs. But after several years, we began noticing that our clients still had a problem with their donor file that was not being addressed: mid-level donors.
While many of these organizations had a robust direct-response program and (with our help) a pretty decent major gift program, there was this middle group of donors who were essentially being treated like a $10 or $25 donor. Here were donors who were giving anywhere between $250 to $9,999 a year, and all the organization was doing was sending them the same mail and e-mails that a $10-a-year donor would get.
In my previous life working for a direct-response agency, one way we tried to solve this problem was to create “higher-end” packages. Perhaps mail a first class stamp on a closed faced envelope, or a “proposal-type” mailing that would be personalized to the donor. Some of these things worked, but if I really had to be honest, it didn’t do much to move the needle; many times we ended up just mailing the “junk stuff” to the middle donors.
But even though these middle donors were giving more, overall their attrition rates were right up there with the $10 and $25 donors. This meant that in many cases, the organizations were losing millions of dollars a year to low retention rates.
How could we fix this problem?
Over a year ago, Veritus Group developed a new concept to take the best of what we knew about the direct-response program (essentially, don’t stop mailing and e-mailing) and the best of the major gift program (one-to-one communication to cultivate and steward donors) and put them together to create a mid-level donor program using mid-level officers who have caseloads of between 500-600 donors each.
The results after a year have been quite encouraging. We are tracking retention rates, overall revenue, and the number of mid-level donors moving to major gift caseloads. For one client, we saw retention rates increase by almost 10% – over $3.4MM in revenue! And we saw over 70 new donors move into major gift caseloads. That is over a 25% increase in the number of major donors they now have to cultivate.
We’re seeing similar results with other clients. This tells us that by cultivating and stewarding donors in a more one-to-one manner, in a cost-effective way, we can reduce attrition and move more donors, creating a faster pipeline into major gifts.
So how do you do it? I’m going to tell you the step-by-step process so you too can be successful.
Here it is:

1. Review your data. Figure out what a “mid-level” donor is for your organization. For some it may be $100-$499, others $250-$999 and still others $1,000-$9,999. You need to determine how many donors you have in the mid-level category, and then code these donors so you can track performance over time.
2. Develop the caseload. As you know for a major gift caseload, the most you can handle well is 150 donors. For mid-level we recommend 500-600 donors. Remember that you have to be aware of your return on investment (ROI). How much revenue does this group of donors represent? Get that figure. Then determine how much can you spend on this group of donors to have an acceptable ROI of somewhere between 8:1 and 15:1.
3. Tier the donors. We suggest separating your donors into A, B and C levels. Put them into these tiers based on giving amount, recency, lifetime giving, and any wealth indicator information you have. Your “A” donors (between 50-75 of all the donors) will be the most likely to move into a major gift program.
4. Set up strategy. Just like you would for a major donor, you need to set up a strategy for each tier level. Tier A would have the most personal touches, etc.
5. Use different types of communication. You will want to use phone, e-mail and personal notes, as well as “you made a difference” touches throughout the year to cultivate and steward these donors. With “A” level donors you REALLY want to get to know them and spend extra time thinking how to create a great donor experience for them.
6. Monitor results. Every quarter, check how these mid-level donors are doing compared to previous year results. I would recommend that in the first year, you conduct an A/B split test. The control could be what you normally do with your mid-level donors, and the test could be the new mid-level rep concept. This will prove to all the executive staff and potential naysayers that this strategy will work, and it will pay high dividends.

Again, much like a major gift program, this is not rocket science. However, it takes focus, accountability and discipline to make it work. Look, almost every non-profit I’m aware of is trying to figure out what to do with mid-level donors. Spending a bunch of money on high-end, personalized mail isn’t going to cut it.
Start treating these donors more personally, like major donors, and start seeing results like ours. What’s holding you back?
Jeff
P.S. If you don’t have the time or personnel to create a mid-level program yourself, we can help. Give me a call at 267-254-2939, or write us here, and we will get back to you to discuss how Veritus Group can help you.